NAPBC Blueprint for Quality and Excellence

Video Introduction (8 Minutes)

Learn about the essential role of the breast imaging department in achieving and maintaining NAPBC (National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers) excellence. From record-keeping and monitoring to auditing and reporting, discover how imaging teams provide an intricate component in the multidisciplinary backbone of healthcare providers offering quality, compliance, and patient safety in accredited breast centers.

Learn More On this Podcast (18 Minutes)

So, maybe your healthcare facility has gathered you and the rest of the multidisciplinary team together to share some exciting news—you’re joining the growing group of institutions in the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers, or NAPBC. And as part of that, your breast imaging services team has explained how you’ll be playing a key role in helping your facility succeed, what’s going to be expected of you, and how your work fits into the bigger quality program.

Or… maybe it wasn’t quite that formal. Maybe someone just said, “Hey, I need this information,” sent you to a website with the 100-plus-page NAPBC manual, and told you to get your data in by the end of next week.

Either way, if “NAPBC” is still a bit of a mystery to you, this episode is a great place to start. We’re going to break down what the NAPBC requires from the breast imaging department and, more importantly, how those requirements translate into real-world tasks like recordkeeping, auditing, monitoring, and reporting. Then we’ll talk about practical, evidence-based ways to not just meet those standards—but really excel at them—so your breast imaging program becomes a strong contributor to your facility’s overall success and multidisciplinary excellence.

Play Episode

Download the NAPBC Access Optimal Resources for Breast Care Standards and Follow This Overview

The Role of Breast Imaging in Multidisciplinary Excellence: Record-Keeping, Monitoring, Auditing, and Reporting Functions Under the NAPBC

The pursuit of multidisciplinary excellence in breast care requires seamless integration of clinical services, quality assurance protocols, and continuous evaluation. The National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers (NAPBC), administered by the American College of Surgeons (ACS), provides a comprehensive framework to guide breast centers in delivering evidence-based, patient-centered care. Within this structure, the breast imaging component is not only foundational to diagnosis and treatment but also central to compliance with rigorous record-keeping, monitoring, auditing, and reporting standards. These processes are essential for validating quality, improving diagnostic outcomes, reducing disparities, and fostering accountability.

This paper outlines the specific contributions required of breast imaging departments under the 2024 NAPBC Standards document titled Optimal Resources for Breast Care. It is designed for professionals engaged in breast imaging and breast cancer management using modalities such as mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and image-guided interventions, and highlights how imaging intersects with broader accreditation objectives—particularly through high-risk patient tracking and risk-adapted screening.

Start here by downloading a copy of the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers Access Optimal Resources for Breast Care Standards. Then, follow along below as the article identifies the key areas the breast imaging department needs to address in record-keeping, monitoring, auditing, and reporting standards.

I. Record-Keeping Functions

Record-keeping is the foundation of NAPBC compliance. It establishes a traceable history of credentials, clinical decision-making, imaging services, and patient management—ensuring transparency and accountability throughout the care continuum.

A. Facility and Modality Accreditation

Under Standard 3.3 (Image-Guided Biopsy Quality Assurance) and Standard 3.4 (Breast Imaging Quality Assurance), facilities must maintain up-to-date accreditation from the American College of Radiology (ACR) or American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS), depending on the modality and provider qualifications:

• Stereotactic breast biopsy: Requires ACR accreditation or ASBrS certification for surgeons performing these procedures.
• Ultrasound and ultrasound-guided biopsy: Must be performed at ACR-accredited facilities or by ASBrS-certified surgeons.
• MRI-guided biopsy: Requires ACR Breast MRI Accreditation if performed onsite.

If a breast center refers patients for services not offered in-house, the facility must establish and document formal referral relationships with accredited providers. These documents are reviewed during NAPBC site visits to ensure that all imaging services—whether provided on-site or referred—meet national quality benchmarks.

B. Pre-Review Documentation

In preparation for NAPBC reaccreditation, all imaging-related documents must be included in the Pre-Review Questionnaire (PRQ). This includes:

• Active ACR or ASBrS accreditation letters
• Evidence of progress toward certification (if not complete)
• Protocols for imaging-pathology concordance
• Sample imaging reports, quality dashboards
• BPLC (Breast Program Leadership Committee) minutes detailing imaging-related discussions and monitoring results

These materials allow site reviewers to assess whether the imaging department is maintaining the standards required for safe, effective, and equitable breast care.

II. Monitoring Functions

Monitoring refers to the active, ongoing assessment of clinical performance, adherence to protocols, and patient outcomes. It ensures that imaging services contribute meaningfully to diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning.

A. Imaging-Pathology Concordance

Standard 5.2 (Diagnostic Imaging of the Breast and Axilla) requires the imaging team to implement a structured process to evaluate concordance between imaging findings and biopsy pathology. This includes:

• Radiologist comments on concordance directly in biopsy reports
• Multidisciplinary radiology-pathology conferences to resolve discrepancies
• Clear documentation of next steps (e.g., re-biopsy, surgery, follow-up)
• A feedback loop to ensure closure on all discordant findings

This process plays a vital role in ensuring diagnostic accuracy and avoiding delayed cancer diagnoses.

B. Evaluation of Outside Studies

Under Standard 5.6, all outside breast imaging for newly diagnosed patients must be formally reviewed before any treatment is initiated. If outside imaging is unavailable or insufficient, the program is responsible for repeating studies on-site. This guarantees that treatment planning is based on comprehensive and high-quality diagnostic information.

C. Screening Protocol Effectiveness

According to Standard 5.1 (Screening for Breast Cancer), imaging departments must design and monitor protocols that include:

• Notification of increased breast density
• Recommendations for supplemental imaging (e.g., MRI, tomosynthesis, ultrasound, contrast-enhanced mammography)
• Patient education materials and risk reduction options
• Documentation of screening intervals and outcomes

The BPLC must review the protocol and its effectiveness at least once during the three-year accreditation cycle, with an eye toward barriers to utilization, disparities in access, or delays in diagnostic workups.

III. Auditing Functions

Auditing involves structured evaluation through both internal mechanisms (e.g., BPLC reviews) and external assessments (e.g., NAPBC site visits).

A. Site Reviewer Evaluation

Site reviewers conduct randomized chart audits and assess facility-wide practices. Their review includes:

• Verification of MQSA compliance
• Documentation of imaging-pathology concordance
• Timeliness and completeness of diagnostic workups
• Verification of physician credentials and modality accreditations

These audits validate that breast imaging practices are in alignment with national and NAPBC standards.

B. BPLC Oversight

The Breast Program Leadership Committee serves as the internal auditing body and is responsible for:

• Annual review of imaging protocols and performance metrics
• Tracking multidisciplinary conference attendance (Standard 2.4)
• Identifying and addressing gaps in risk-based screening and diagnostics
• Reviewing the use and impact of outside imaging
• Oversight of quality improvement (QI) projects that involve imaging performance or access

All findings must be documented in official BPLC minutes and submitted with the PRQ during reaccreditation.

IV. Reporting Functions

Reporting translates clinical data into actionable insights and institutional transparency.

A. Reporting to the BPLC

Imaging departments are expected to report structured data to the BPLC as part of both Standard 7.1 (Quality Measures) and Standard 7.2 (Quality Improvement Initiatives). This may include:

• Recall and biopsy rates
• Abnormal interpretation rates
• Concordance statistics
• Diagnostic time intervals

When deficiencies are identified, the department is expected to participate in corrective action planning, which may include workflow redesign, additional staff training, or protocol updates.

B. Communication of Diagnostic Outcomes

Radiologists must ensure that biopsy results and next steps are clearly communicated to both patients and referring providers. Copies of pathology reports must be integrated into patient records, and any recommendations (e.g., surgical consultation, re-imaging) must be documented and followed up. This ensures a closed-loop communication process that is central to patient safety.

C. Multidisciplinary Breast Care Conference (MBCC)

As per Standard 2.4, radiologists are expected to:

• Participate in all MBCCs, with at least one radiologist present per session
• Present and review imaging findings in each case
• Contribute to treatment planning discussions

Attendance logs and case summaries are reviewed during reaccreditation to verify meaningful participation.

V. High-Risk Patient Tracking: Imaging’s Critical Role in Risk-Based Care

High-risk patient identification and management are emphasized in Standards 5.1 and 5.4 and represent one of the most proactive roles of the imaging department in preventive care and early detection.

A. Record-Keeping

Imaging departments must document:

• Results of validated risk assessment models (e.g., Tyrer-Cuzick, Gail)
• Breast density notifications
• Referrals to high-risk programs or genetic counseling
• Supplemental imaging orders based on lifetime risk
• Patient education efforts on risk reduction strategies

This documentation supports audit readiness and quality improvement evaluations.

B. Monitoring

The BPLC, with support from imaging staff, must monitor:

• Use of supplemental screening tools for high-risk women
• Completion of referrals for genetic services
• Missed or delayed follow-ups
• EMR-based tracking tools or registries

This ensures that risk-based care is reaching its intended population.

C. Auditing

Chart reviews must validate:

• Accurate stratification of risk
• Timely follow-up for high-risk findings
• Appropriateness of imaging modality selection

Auditing results are used to adjust screening protocols and identify workflow issues.

D. Reporting

Annual reporting to the BPLC should include:

• Number of patients identified as high-risk
• Screening completion rates
• Outcome metrics
• Participation in QI initiatives (e.g., improving MRI access)

These efforts support accreditation and demonstrate leadership in risk-adapted care.

E. Integration into Imaging Protocols

Imaging departments must have protocols for modality selection based on risk:

• MRI for women with ≥20% lifetime risk
• Ultrasound or CEM for dense breasts or MRI ineligibility

These must be embedded into clinical workflows and referenced during site audits.

VI. Summary Table: Breast Imaging Responsibilities by NAPBC Standard

Conclusion

The breast imaging department is indispensable in achieving and maintaining NAPBC accreditation. It is not only a diagnostic service but a core pillar of multidisciplinary care, tasked with ensuring evidence-based, risk-adapted, and data-driven breast health management. From credential tracking and imaging quality assurance to high-risk patient monitoring and outcome reporting, imaging professionals are essential in driving quality improvement and patient-centered care.

By aligning with NAPBC standards and continuously evaluating performance, the imaging team contributes to safer diagnostics, earlier interventions, and better outcomes for all patients—including those at elevated risk. This underscores the department’s critical role in fostering a culture of excellence in breast care delivery.

Disclaimer: This article is intended for educational and informational purposes only. Readers should begin by downloading a copy of the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers (NAPBC) Optimal Resources for Breast Care Standards to ensure access to the official requirements. The content above is not a substitute for the official standards but is designed to highlight and explain key areas the breast imaging department must address in record-keeping, monitoring, auditing, and reporting to support accreditation and multidisciplinary excellence. For authoritative guidance, always refer directly to the NAPBC Standards and the American College of Surgeons.

References

• American College of Surgeons. Optimal Resources for Breast Care: 2024 Standards. National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers (NAPBC). 2025.
• Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA), U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov
• American College of Radiology. National Mammography Database (NMD). https://www.acr.org
• National Consortium of Breast Centers. National Quality Measures for Breast Centers™ (NQMBC). https://www.nqmbc.org